A review writ petition filed by the Union of India against a land acquisition decision was dismissed for non-prosecution as defects remained unremoved and no appearance was made by the petitioner.
The review petition and stay application were dismissed and disposed of respectively.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:21587-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Review Petition (Writ) No. 31/2022
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : None present
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA
Order
07/05/2024
No one put in appearance on behalf of petitioner.
Defect(s) have not been removed since long.
The present Review Petition (Writ) is accordingly, dismissed for non-prosecution.
Stay application shall stand disposed.
(SHUBHA MEHTA),J
(PANKAJ BHANDARI),J
MAHIMA/140
The Union Of India
Nathulal S/o Shri Ramjilal
Kailash Prasad S/o Shri Ramjilal
Murari Lal S/o Shri Ramjilal
Land Acquisition Officer, Dausa -Gangapur Rail Marg
State Of Rajasthan
Pankaj Bhandari
Shubha Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
