The High Court of Rajasthan dismissed a review petition challenging an appeal order. The Court held that the documents pertaining to the appeal had been dealt with, thus negating the contention that an application under Order 41 Rule 27 of C.P.C. was not decided.
Petitioner's review petition was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:35085-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Review Petition (Writ) No. 15/2019
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Raghavendra Singh Khichi, Adv. For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
Order
(2 of 2)
[2024:RJ-JP:35085-DB]
[WRW-15/2019]
20/08/2024
(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J
(PANKAJ BHANDARI),J
Ashwani Kr Srivastava /-33
3 issues framed by the court
Whether an appeal was decided without addressing the filed application under Order 41 Rule 27 of C.P.C.?
Whether documents filed with the memo of appeal required the formal application under Order 41 Rule 27 of C.P.C. to be explicitly decided?
Whether the review petition admitted under Order 41 Rule 27 of C.P.C. has any merit?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Bodu Singh
Ram Dhan
Hari Shankar
Agar Singh
Naurang Singh
Devi Singh
Pankaj Bhandari
Praveer Bhatnagar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
