High Court at Jaipur dismissed a restoration application in default due to the non-appearance of the petitioner. The court noted no attempt was made to contest the matter.
The restoration application is dismissed in default due to non-appearance of the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:23263]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Restoration Application No. 71/2019
IN
S. B. Civil Misc. Application No. 362/2014
IN
S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 180/2003
(2 of 2)
[2024:RJ-JP:23263]
[WRES-71/2019]
About 49 Years, Dy. Manager
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : None For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order
16/05/2024
The matter pertains to the year 2019.
It appears from perusal of the Court file that no attempts have been made to contest the matter. Even today, when the matter was called, no one appeared on behalf of the petitioner.
Therefore, the present restoration application is dismissed in default.
(SAMEER JAIN),J
Pooja /40
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the current restoration application can be decided in the absence of the petitioner.
Riico Officers Association and ors.
The Rajasthan State Industrial Development and Investment Corporation Limited (Riico)
The State Of Rajasthan
Shri Jugal Kishore Sharma
Sameer Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
