Disposed

Tara Ram Chouhan v. Shri Shyam Singh Rajpurohit

Rajasthan HC7 May 2024WCP/1203/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ contempt petition alleging non-compliance of a 2018 order, the court disposed of the matter ex-parte as the petitioner did not appear. Noting the officials had changed and the petition lagged six years, the court granted liberty to file a fresh petition with current incumbents.

What did the court decide?

Contempt petition disposed of; petitioner granted liberty to file a fresh contempt petition against current incumbent officials.

Tara Ram Chouhan Vs Shri Shyam Singh Rajpurohit — Contempt of Court | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JD:20253]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Writ Contempt No. 1203/2018

¶4

Tara Ram Chouhan S/o Shri Bhalu Ram, Aged About 45 Years, Village Chitariya, Post Utbada, Sojat City, District Pali.

¶5

Rajendra Kumar Meena S/o Shri Bhajan Lal,, Aged About 41 Years, Village Radhe Ki, Post Shafi Pura, Tehsil Bamanwas, District Sawai Madhopur.

¶6

Rukam Kesh Meena S/o Shri Dev Kishan Meena,, Aged About 41 Years, Village Jadoli, Tehsil Bamanwas, District Sawai Madhopur.

¶7

----Petitioners

¶8

Versus

¶9

Shri Shyam Singh Rajpurohit, The Director, Elementary Education, Bikaner.

¶10

Dharmendra Kumar Joshi, The District Education Officer, Elementary Education, Jodhpur.

¶11

Shri Prabhu Lal Panwar, The District Education Officer, Secondary Education, Jodhpur.

¶12

Shri Om Prakash Sharma, The District Education Officer, Elementary Education, Barmer.

¶13

Shri Gopal Singh Sodha, The District Education Officer, Secondary Education, Barmer.

¶14

State Of Rajasthan Through The Director, Elementary Education, Bikaner.

¶15

----Respondents

¶16

For Petitioner(s)	: Nonepresent
For Respondent(s)	:

¶17

JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA

¶18

Order

¶19

07/05/2024

¶20

No one appears on behalf of the petitioner.

¶21

The present contempt petition has been preferred alleging non compliance of the order dated 15.02.2018 passed by the Court.

¶22

The petition is pending for more than 6 years.

(2 of 2)

[2024:RJ-JD:20253]

[WCP-1203/2018]

The official respondents must have by now changed and even if the contempt petition as framed is considered, they cannot be prosecuted/punished.

¶27

The contempt petition is, therefore, disposed of.

¶28

Petitioner shall be free to file a fresh contempt petition, if his grievance still subsists, however while impleading the present incumbents in the office of respondents – Department.

¶29

(DINESH MEHTA),J

¶30

225-Arvind/-

Tara Ram Chouhan v. Shri Shyam Singh Rajpurohit

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tara Ram Chouhan v. Shri Shyam Singh Rajpurohit

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Heera Ram Vs State of Rajasthan

Devendra Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan

Kailash Lal Purohit Vs the State of Rajasthan

Kamal Kishore Hada Vs the State of Rajasthan

Gopal Lal Banjara Vs the Registrar

Kamlesh Kumar Rawat Vs State of Rajasthan