Second application for suspension of sentence in a murder appeal where the applicant had undergone six years and eight months of custody. The first application was dismissed on merits; the court found no change in circumstances and dismissed the second application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:34817-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Criminal Misc. Second Suspension Of Sentence Application (Appeal) No. 533/2024
In
D.B. Criminal Appeal No.273/2022
Rakesh Chaubdar @ Kaggal S/o Bhairu Lal, R/o Near Tejaji Mandir, Old Bardana, P.S. Railway Colony, Kota City (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Kota).
----Applicant
Versus
State of Rajasthan through P.P.
----Respondent
For Applicant(s) : Mr. Shamsuddin Ansari For State : Mr. Javed Choudhary, Addl. G.A. For Victim(s) : None Present
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL
Order
16/08/2024
[2024:RJ-JP:34817-DB]
[SOSA-533/2024]
(2 of 2)
by this Court directing that paper book be prepared and the matter be listed for hearing. It is argued that paper book has been prepared, but the matter has not been listed for hearing. It is further contended that applicant has remained in custody for a period of six years and eight months.
(BHUWAN GOYAL),J
(PANKAJ BHANDARI),J
AMIT/Tahir/4
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the second application for suspension of sentence should be entertained given no change in circumstances.
Rakesh Chaubdar @ Kaggal S/o Bhairu Lal
State of Rajasthan through P.P.
Pankaj Bhandari
Bhuwan Goyal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
