Dharma v. State of Rajasthan
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court allowed an application for suspension of sentence under Section 389 Cr.P.C., directing the appellants to deposit 50% of the fine and execute a personal bond.
What did the court decide?
Substantive sentences suspended; appellants directed to deposit 50% of fine and execute personal bond with sureties.
What the court decided
[2024:RJ-JD:21015]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc Suspension Of Sentence Application (Appeal) No. 364/2024
- Dharma S/o Heera, Aged About 52 Years, R/o Bhilu Rana, Kacchi Basti, P.s. Ambamata, District Udaipur, Rajasthan. (Appellants Are In Central Jail Udaipur)
- Manish @ Manoj S/o Jagirdar, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Bhilu Rana, Kacchi Basti, District Udaipur, Rajasthan. (Appellants Are In Central Jail At Udaipur)
- Prithviraj @ Pratap @ Prithvi S/o Bheru Lal, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Bhilu Rana, Kacchi Basti, P.s. Ambamata, District Udaipur, Rajasthan. (Appellants Are In Central Jail Udaipur)
- Pappu S/o Dharma, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Bhilu Rana, Kacchi Basti, Ambamata, District Udaipur, Rajasthan. (Appellants Are In Central Jail Udaipur)
- Sanjay S/o Punjaram, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Bhilu Rana, Kacchi Basti, Ambamata, District Udaipur, Rajasthan. (Appellants Are In Central Jail Udaipur)
----Petitioners
Versus
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the substantive sentences passed against the appellants should be suspended pending the final disposal of their appeal.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Dharma S/o Heera
- appellant
Manish @ Manoj
- appellant
Prithviraj @ Pratap
- appellant
Pappu
- appellant
Sanjay
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · May
- Registered
- Case no.
- SOSA/364/2024
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court