Allowed

Neeraj Son of Dhani Ram Yadav, v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC10 May 2024SOSA/189/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Applicant convicted by special court under the POCSO Act and sentenced to twenty years' imprisonment with fine sought suspension of sentence pending appeal. Citing evidence contradictions, victim's age documents, compromise between parties, and delay in appeal disposal, the High Court allowed suspension subject to furnishing bonds.

What did the court decide?

Execution of sentence suspended on furnishing personal bond of Rs. 50,000 and two sureties of Rs. 25,000-25,000 each, with undertaking to appear on 10-06-2024 and thereafter as directed.

Neeraj Son of Dhani Ram Yadav, Vs State of… — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:22219]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Misc Suspension Of Sentence Application (Appeal) No. 189/2024

¶4

¶5

S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 3668/2023

¶6

Neeraj Son Of Dhani Ram Yadav, Aged About 21 Years, Resident Of Nabi Nagar, Police Station Shekhpur Aheer, District Alwar (Raj.) (At Present In Central Jail, Alwar)

¶7

----Petitioner

¶8

Versus

¶9

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.

¶10

Jamshida Wife Of Umardeen, Resident Of Village Milakpur Turk, Police Station Shekhpur Aheer, District Alwar (Raj.)

¶11

Victim, R/o

¶12

----Respondents

¶13

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Surendra Singh Sunda For Respondent(s) : Mr. B.S. Sharma, P.P. Mr. Vikram Singh Chouhan

¶14

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI

¶15

Order

¶16

10/05/2024

¶17

vihykFkhZ@vfHk;qDr uhjt dh vksj ls /kkjk 389 n0iz0la0 ds varxZr] fopkj.k U;k;ky;& fof'k"V U;k;k/kh'k] fo'ks"k U;k;ky;] ySafxd vijk/kksa ls ckydksa dk laj{k.k vf/kfu;e&2012 ,oa ckyd vf/kdkj laj{k.k vk;ksx vf/kfu;e&2005] dze&3] vyoj ¼jkt0½ }kjk ls'ku izdj.k la[;k& 49@2022] jkT; cuke uhjt esa ikfjr fu.kZ; o naMkns'k fnukad 04-12-2023 ds fo:) ;g ltk LFkxu izkFkZuk i= izLrqr fd;k x;k gS] ftlds }kjk vihykFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dks vkjksfir vijk/kksa esa nks"kfl) fd;k

[2024:RJ-JP:22219]

[SOSA-189/2024]

(2 of 3)

tkdj vFkZn.M lfgr vf/kdre chl o"kZ ds dBksj dkjkokl ls nf.Mr fd;k x;k gSA

¶22

cgl lquh xbZA

¶23

fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dk rdZ jgk gS fd fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk i=koyh ij miyC/k lk{; dk lexz foospu o fo'ys"k.k fd, fcuk vk{ksfir fu.kZ; ,oa n.Mkns'k ikfjr fd;k x;k gSA mudk ;g Hkh fuosnu gS fd vihykFkhZ fnukad 23-10-2022 ls yxkrkj vfHkj{kk esa gSA ifjokfn;k te'khnk ds c;ku ih0MCY;w&4 ds :i esa ys[kc) gq, gSa] og i{knzksgh ?kksf"kr gqbZ gSa] ftlus vfHk;kstu dgkuh dk leFkZu ugha fd;k gSA ihfM+rk dh vk;q ds laca/k esa vyx&vyx nLrkost is'k fd, x, gSa] mldk tks tUe izek.k i= is'k fd;k x;k gS] og lansgtud gSaA ihfM+rk ds firk }kjk ihfM+rk dk tUe izek.k cuokus ds fy, tks vkosnu i= fn;k x;k gS] og izn'kZ Mh&11 jgk gS] ftlds vuqlkj ihfM+rk dh tUe fnukad 07-09-2004 crkbZ xbZ gSA blds vfrfjDr vLirky ds nLrkost izn'kZ ih&12 ,oa 13 Hkh is'k fd, x, gSa] ftlds vuqlkj Hkh fnukad 07-09-2004 dks ihfM+rk dh eka vLirky esa HkrhZ gqbZ Fkh] mDr nLrkost ihfM+rk dh eka ds fMyhojh ds jgs gSaA mudk ;g Hkh fuosnu gS fd ?kVuk fnukad 13-10-2022 dks gksuk crkbZ xbZ gS rFkk vfHk;qDr dks ekSds ij gh idM+ fy;k tkuk crk;k gS] ijUrq vfHk;qDr dh fxjQ~rkjh fnukad 23-10-2022 dks dh xbZ gSA lk{khx.k ds dFkuksa esa fojks/kkHkkl gSA mudk ;g Hkh fuosnu gS fd i{kdkjku dk vkil esa jkthukek Hkh gks pqdk gSA vihy ds fuLrkj.k esa le; yxsxk] vr% vihykFkhZ dh vksj ls izLrqr ltk LFkxu izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkosA

¶24

blds foijhr fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us ltk LFkxu izkFkZuk i= dk fojks/k dj izdj.k dh xaHkhjrk dh vksj /;ku vkdf"kZr djkdj izLrqr ltk LFkxu izkFkZuk i= [kkfjt fd, tkus dh izkFkZuk dhA

[2024:RJ-JP:22219]

[SOSA-189/2024]

(3 of 3)

ifjoknh ds ;ksX; vf/koDrk dk rdZ gS fd i{kdkjku ds e/; vkil esa jkthukek gks pqdk gS] vr% blh vuqlkj izkFkZuk i= fuLrkfjr fd, tkus dh izkFkZuk dh gSA

¶29

geus mHk; i{kksa ds rdksZa fordksZa ij euu fd;k] i=koyh dk /;kuiwoZd voyksdu fd;k x;kA fopkj.k ds nkSjku vkbZ lk{;] i{kdkjku ds e/; gq, jkthukek ds rF;ksa] vihykFkhZ dh vfHkj{kk vof/k] izdj.k ds rF;ksa ,oa vU; lHkh ifjfLFkfr;ksa rFkk vihy ds fuLrkj.k esa le; yxus dh laHkkouk dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, ;g ltk LFkxu izkFkZuki= Lohdkj fd;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA

¶30

ifj.kker% vihykFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g ltk LFkxu izkFkZuki= Lohdkj fd;k tkdj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;fn vihykFkhZ@vfHk;qDr bl ekeys esa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn 50]000@& :i, ¼ v{kjs ipkl gtkj :i;s½ dk O;fDrxr ca/ki= ,oa 25]000&25000@&:i, ¼ v{kjs iPphl&iPphl gtkj :i;s½ dh nks lqn`<+ ,oa fo'oluh; izfrHkwfr;ka bl vk'k; dh izLrqr dj ns fd og bl U;k;ky; esa fnukad 10-06-2024 dks ,oa rRi'pkr~ tc Hkh mls vknsf'kr fd;k tkos] og mifLFkr gksrk jgsxk] rks vihykFkhZ@vfHk;qDr& uhjt iq= Jh /kuh jke ;kno dks vfoyEc tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tk,A

¶31

fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr mijksDr vk{ksfir fu.kZ; ds rgr fn, x, n.Mkns'k ¼sentence½ dk fdz;kUo;u bl vihy ds vfUre fu.kZ; rd LFkfxr j[kk tkrk gSA

¶32

(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J

¶33

MANOJ ADWANI/28

Neeraj Son of Dhani Ram Yadav, v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Neeraj Son of Dhani Ram Yadav, v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramraj Vs Smt Sanjana Devi and Anr.

Devpal Son of Shri Babulal Vs State of Rajasthan

Ravi Goyal S/O Shri Satya Narayan Vs the State of Rajasthan

Shahrukh Khan Son of Shri Saleem Vs State of Rajasthan

Kailash Chand Saini Son of Shri Tejaram Saini Vs Dinesh Khandelwal Son of Shri Vishambar Dayal

Omprakash Sharma S/O Sh. Khacchi Ram Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan