Petition for suspension of sentence dismissed. The Court held that no case was made out for suspension given the victim's age (under sixteen) and her statement, despite the lack of opposition from the victim's side.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:9082-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Criminal Misc Suspension Of Sentence Application No.
1260/2023
in
D. B. Criminal Appeal (Db) No.224/2023
Bhanwarlal S/o Shri Chhitarmal, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Vijaygovindpura, Police Station Jobner, District Jaipur (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur)
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Martand Pratap Singh. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Alka Bhatnagar, Addl.G.A.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Order
22/02/2024
[2024:RJ-JP:9082-DB]
[SOSA-1260/2023]
(2 of 2)
PW3-victim in her statement has leveled the allegation of committing rape with her on the applicant-accused along with other co-accused persons. Counsel further submits that the victim has been duly informed about the filing of appeal as well as present application for suspension of sentence. However, no one has appeared on behalf of the victim to oppose the present application for suspension of sentence.
(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J
(INDERJEET SINGH),J
Tushar/31
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the sentence awarded to the petitioner should be suspended pending appeal?
Bhanwarlal
State Of Rajasthan
Santosh Kumar
INDERJEET SINGH
ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
