The D.B. Special Appeal was dismissed as it was hopelessly barred by limitation. The Court rejected the condonation of delay application, characterizing the Covid delay excuse as lame given the impugned order dates in 2019.
Condonation of delay application dismissed, consequently appeal dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:50766-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 509/2023
Neetu Rohilla W/o Sunil Rohilla, Aged About 42 Years, R/o 136, Rohilla Sadan, Shiv Colony, Tijara Phatak, Alwar (Raj.)
----Appellant
Versus
----Respondents
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Jagmohan Bhardwaj For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR
Order
10/12/2024
[2024:RJ-JP:50766-DB]
[SAW-509/2023]
(2 of 2)
(ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J
(MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),CJ
NAVAL KISHOR/Gautam-53
3 issues framed by the court
Whether delay in filing the appeal can be condoned due to the Covid-19 pandemic.
Whether the appeal is barred by limitation.
Whether the application for condonation of delay stands dismissed.
Neetu Rohilla W/o Sunil Rohilla
State Of Rajasthan
Manindra Mohan Shrivastava
Ashutosh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
