This D.B. Special Appeal Writ was dismissed on the ground that the appellant had an alternative remedy under Section 9A of the Rajasthan Excise Act and thus the court was not inclined to entertain the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:36013-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 440/2022
Surendra Singh Bijarniya S/o Shri Ramdev Singh Bijrania, Aged About 47 Years, R/o Ward No. 8, Mehata Ka Bass, Palsana, Tehsil Palsana, District Sikar (Raj.).
----Appellant
Versus
----Respondents
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Sultan Singh Kuri, Adv. For Respondent(s) : None present
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR
Order
28/08/2024
[2024:RJ-JP:36013-DB]
[SAW-440/2022]
has not deposited the amount and has claimed relief under the writ jurisdiction.
(ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J
(PANKAJ BHANDARI),J
MR/62
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present Special Appeal should be entertained in view of the availability of an alternative remedy.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Surendra Singh Bijarniya
The State Of Rajasthan
The Excise Commissioner
The Additional Excise Commissioner
The District Excise Officer
The Excise Inspector
Pankaj Bhandari
Ashutosh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
