Appeal against an order admitting a child under RTE Act. Upheld admission as lawful but directed future admissions be subject to residential location and State policy.
Settled that in case the child seeks admission in Class I/II in the future, the identical matter may be considered as per residential location and State policy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JODHPUR
D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 39/2024
Aaradhya Bhati
----Appellant
| Versus | ||
|---|---|---|
| The State Of Rajasthan | ----Respondent | |
| For Appellant(s) : |
Mr. Ratana Ram | |
| For Respondent(s) : |
Mr. B.L. Bhati,AAG |
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN GOPAL VYAS
Order
24/05/2024
The present appeal arises out of the prayer of the appellant to admit his child through online mode for admission in class-I for the Session 2023-24 in terms of Section 12(1)(c) of the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009.
[SAW-39/2024]
(2 of 2)
(MADAN GOPAL VYAS),J (DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J
18-neha/Dinesh/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appellant was entitled to admission for the child in a government school under Section 12(1)(c) of the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Aaradhya Bhati
The State Of Rajasthan
Pushpendra Singh Bhati
Madan Gopal Vyas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
