The Division Bench allowed the condonation of a 10-day delay in filing the special appeal under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The appeal against the Single Judge's order was dismissed as the appellants were not inclined to interfere.
Condonation of delay of 10 days allowed; Special Appeal dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JD:2621-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR.
….
D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 372/2023.
----Appellants
Versus
----Respondents
| For Appellant(s) | : Mr. Shravan Kumar Ojha. |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Prashant Tatia on behalf of |
| Mr. Sajjan Singh Rajpurohit. |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA PRAKASH SONI Judgment
[2024:RJ-JD:2621-DB]
[SAW-372/2023]
(2 of 2)
17/01/2024
(RAJENDRA PRAKASH SONI),J (VIJAY BISHNOI),J
89-Mohan/-
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the delay of 10 days in filing the special appeal is condonable under Section 5 of the Limitation Act.
Whether the Single Judge's order directing adjustment of 2002 deposit to determine the final amount requires interference in appeal.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Jodhpur Development Authority, Jodhpur
Farida D/o Sh. Iqbal Mohammed
Vijay Bishnoi
Rajendra Prakash Soni
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
