The High Court permitted withdrawal of the underlying writ petition upon settlement. Consequently, the present special appeal was dismissed as infructuous.
Permission granted to withdraw the writ petition; original writ petition dismissed and impugned orders nullified; special appeal dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JD:23820-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 343/2010
State Of Raj. And Ors
----Appellant
Versus
M/s. Aradhana Trading Company
----Respondent
| For Appellant(s) | : Mr. M. C. Bishnoi |
|---|---|
| Mr. L. K. Purohit | |
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Tarun Joshi on VC |
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN GOPAL VYAS
Order
24/05/2024
(MADAN GOPAL VYAS),J (DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J
90-nidhi/-
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to permit withdrawal of the underlying writ petition by the private respondent after settlement.
Whether the special appeal should be dismissed as having become infructuous upon withdrawal.
State Of Raj. And Ors
M/s. Aradhana Trading Company
PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
MADAN GOPAL VYAS
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
