The appellate court allowed the appellant's request to withdraw the appeal under CBDT circular norms, as the tax effect was below two crores. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn, and the substantial question of law was kept open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:46981-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Income Tax Appeal No. 10/2022
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jaipur-Ii, Jaipur.
----Appellant
Versus
Smt. Pallavi Mishra, A-801, Aurum Tilak Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur. ----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Sandeep Pathak For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sandeep Taneja, AAG
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS
Order
14/11/2024
(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J
(AVNEESH JHINGAN),J
Riya/2
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jaipur-Ii
Smt. Pallavi Mishra
Avneesh Jhingan
Uma Shanker Vyas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
