The High Court dismissed a Habeas Corpus Petition seeking production of the petitioner's daughter, revealed to be married. The Court relied on a report and an existing protection order issued in a separate writ petition regarding a protection against harassment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:51780-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Habeas Corpus Petition No. 410/2024
Ram Pratap S/o Ramjeevan, Aged About 52 Years, R/o Village Dohli, Tehsil Ramgarh, District Alwar (Rajasthan).
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
Mr. Sawai Singh, C.I., Police Station Ramgarh, Alwar, present in person.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA
Order
(2 of 2)
[2024:RJ-JP:51780-DB]
[HC-410/2024]
17/12/2024
(SHUBHA MEHTA),J
(PANKAJ BHANDARI),J
AMIT/156
3 issues framed by the court
Whether a Habeas Corpus Petition seeking production of a married daughter can be admitted when a protection order is already issued.
Whether the corpus can be said to be in illegal detention given her marital status and existing protection order.
Whether the Habeas Corpus Petition should be dismissed as not maintainable.
Ram Pratap S/o Ramjeevan
State of Rajasthan through Secretary Home Department
Director General of Police
Additional Director General of Police
Superintendent of Police, Alwar
S.H.O. Police Station Ramgarh
Pankaj Bhandari
Shubha Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
