The High Court dismissed the habeas corpus petition not pressed in the absence of a substantive argument, granting liberty for the petitioner to seek alternative legal remedies.
Petitioner granted liberty to avail appropriate remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JODHPUR
D.B. Habeas Corpus Petition No. 40/2024
Urmila Lohar
----Petitioner
| The State Of Rajasthan | Versus --- |
|---|---|
| For Petitioner(s) : Mr. |
Deepesh Singh Beniwal |
| For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mr. |
MA Siddiqui, AAG with A.R. Malkani |
----Respondent
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA PRAKASH SONI
Order
25/01/2024
Learned counsel for the petitioner, without arguing the matter on merits, has submitted that he does not want to press this habeas corpus petition, however, seeks liberty for the petitioner to avail appropriate remedy available to her under the law.
Accordingly, this habeas corpus petition is dismissed as not pressed with the liberty sought for.
(RAJENDRA PRAKASH SONI),J
(VIJAY BISHNOI),J
111-Arun/-
Urmila Lohar
The State Of Rajasthan
VIJAY BISHNOI
RAJENDRA PRAKASH SONI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
