Disposed

Bhagwan Singh Rathor S/O Chagan Singh v. Addational Chief Secretary (Acs)

Rajasthan HC24 Jan 2024CW/983/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Pension-related writ petition covered by Division Bench decision in Ramesh Chander Gupta. Court permitted petitioners to file representation and directed respondents to consider and decide it within two months in light of that judgment, extending benefits if averments found correct.

What the court decided

AI extract

Bhagwan Singh Rathor S/O Chagan Singh Vs… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:4145]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 983/2024

¶4

Bhagwan Singh Rathor S/o Chagan Singh, Aged About 62 Years, R/o 55/158, Purnima Place Maheshwari School Ke Piche, Ratidang Road, Vaishali Nagar, Ajmer, Raj.

¶5

Babu Lal S/o Kana Ram, Aged About 62 Years, R/o VillTabiji, Po-Mangliyawas, Ajmer, Raj.

¶6

Shokat Ali S/o Fakir Mo., Aged About 62 Years, R/o H.no. 61-A/02, New Basti, Loha Khan, Ajmer, Raj.

¶7

----Petitioners

¶8

Versus

¶9

Addational Chief Secretary (Acs), Department Of Home, Government Of Rajasthan Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶10

Addational Chief Secretary (Acs), Department Of Finance, Government Of Rajasthan Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶11

Director General Of Police, Jaipur.

¶12

Inspector General Of Police, Ajmer Range, Ajmer, Raj.

¶13

Superintendent Of Police, Ajmer, Rajasthan.

¶14

Directorate Of Pension And Pensioners Welfare, Rajasthan, Jaipur.

¶15

----Respondents

¶16

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shrey Pradhan For Respondent(s) :

¶17

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA

¶18

Judgment / Order

¶19

24/01/2024

¶20

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the controversy involved in the present case is squarely covered by the judgment of Division Bench in the case of Ramesh Chander Gupta Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (D.B. Civil Writ

[2024:RJ-JP:4145]

[CW-983/2024]

(2 of 3)

Petition No. 2800/2021) and other connected matters, decided on 17.10.2023 .

¶25

In these circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks liberty to approach respondent/s by way of filing a representation for redressal of his grievances in the light of judgment rendered by this court in the case of Ramesh Chander Gupta (supra).

¶26

In the case of Ramesh Chander Gupta (supra), Division Bench of this Court inter-alia while referring to orders passed in Union of India & Ors. Vs. Manohar Lal & Ors.: D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5445/2022, dediced on 07.08.2023 & the Commissioner, Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan & Anr. Vs. Ram Karan Bhakar & Ors.: D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4139/2022 as well as judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Director (Admn. & HR) KPTCL & Ors. Vs. C.P. Mundinamani & Ors.: 2023 SCC online SC 401 has passed the following directions:-

¶27

“It is also brought to the notice of this Court that Special Leave Petition (C) No. 3420/2023 and Special Leave Petition (C) No. 1011/2023 have also been disposed off on 19.05.2023. A copy of the orders dated 11.04.2023 and 19.05.2023 passed by Hon’ble Supreme Court have also been placed on record. Therefore, the present petitions are also disposed off on the same terms with direction to the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioners and pass appropriate orders and other consequential benefits as per their entitlement. Whatever amount is found payable be also released within a period of one month. Accordingly, the present petitions are disposed of.”

¶28

Ordered accordingly.

[2024:RJ-JP:4145]

[CW-983/2024]

(3 of 3)

In the event of filing a representation by the petitioners, the respondent/s shall consider the claim of the petitioners and pass an appropriate order within two months from the date of receipt of representation with certified copy of this order and that too in accordance with law and the observations made in the case of Ramesh Chander Gupta (supra). The writ petition stands disposed of.

¶33

The order has been passed on the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the averments made in the writ petition. The respondent/s would be at liberty to examine the veracity of the submissions made in the writ petition in the light of the observations made by the Division Bench of this court in the case of Ramesh Chander Gupta , and only in case the averments made therein are found to be correct, the petitioner be extended the relief as prayed with consequential benefits as ordered in the case of Ramesh Chander Gupta .

¶34

Since the main petition has been disposed of, stay application and all pending application/s, if any, to dispose.

¶35

(GANESH RAM MEENA),J

¶36

Seema/71

Bhagwan Singh Rathor S/O Chagan Singh v. Addational Chief Secretary (Acs)

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Bhagwan Singh Rathor S/O Chagan Singh v. Addational Chief Secretary (Acs)

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dr Satyanarayan Sharma S/O Sh. Bajrang Lal Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan

Niraj Kumari Daughter of Shri Munshee Lal Prajapati Vs State of Rajasthan

Pushpa Swami D/O Sh. Durga Prasad Swami Vs State of Rajasthan

Baldev S/O Shri Badri Prasad Prajapat Vs State of Rajasthan

Ramgopal Saini S/O Shri Lalman Saini Vs the State of Rajasthan

Mukesh Chand Meena, S/O Shri Nathya Ram Vs State of Rajasthan