Petitioner challenged orders allowing respondents to participate in suit and injunction proceedings at the evidence stage under Article 226. Dismissed.
None. Writ petitions dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:35967]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9706/2024
Jagdish Narayan S/o Late Panchuram Meena, Aged About 75 Years, R/o Village Laxmidamodarpura @ Nagariyawala, Near Sector Seven, Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur.
----Plaintiff-Petitioner
Versus
----Defendants-Respondents Connected With
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9761/2024
Jagdish Narayan S/o Late Panchuram Meena, Aged About 75 Years, R/o Village Laxmidamodarpura @ Nagariyawala, Near Sector Seven, Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur.
----Plaintiff-Petitioner
Versus
(2 of 3) [CW-9706/2024]
[2024:RJ-JP:35967]
----Defendants-Respondents
For Petitioner(s) For Respondent(s)
: Mr. S.L. Sharma :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order
28/08/2024
(3 of 3)
[2024:RJ-JP:35967]
[CW-9706/2024]
trial Court has saddled the respondents-defendants with cost to compensate the delay as well as for their conduct.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J
SOURAV /59-60
1 issue framed by the court
Whether High Court should interfere in letting respondents participate in suit and injunction applications at early evidence stage.
Jagdish Narayan
Rajasthan Housing Board
State Of Rajasthan
Sudes Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
