The High Court disposed of the writ petition due to a subsequent order passed during its pendency. It granted liberty to the petitioner to raise all pleas before the Appellate Authority.
Liberty to raise all pleas before the Appellate Authority.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:7716-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9624/2007
M/s P.n. And Company. A Partnership Firm Having Its Office At Gattani Bhawan Through Its Partner Ju, Gattani Bhawan, Gangauri Bazar, Jaipur
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. P.K. Kasliwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sandeep Pathak
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA
Order
14/02/2024
Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that during the pendency of the petition, the order in pursuance to the impugned notice was passed and the petitioner has preferred this appeal.
In view of the subsequent development, this writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to raise all the pleas raised in this petition before the Appellate Authority.
(SHUBHA MEHTA),J
(AVNEESH JHINGAN),J
LAKSHYA/ DAKSH/12
M/s P.n. And Company
Union Of India
Avneesh Jhingam
Shubha Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
