Disposed

Padma Jaipal v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC29 Jan 2024CW/9611/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A municipal employee challenged her transfer order dated 19.07.2021 by writ petition; interim stay was operating since 29.07.2021. On joint submission of counsel, the Court made the interim order absolute and left respondents free to pass a fresh transfer order per administrative exigency.

What did the court decide?

Interim stay of the order dated 19.07.2021 made absolute; respondents given liberty to pass fresh transfer order in accordance with law.

Padma Jaipal Vs State of Rajasthan — Service and Employment | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

(1 of 2) [CW-9611/2021]

¶2

[2024:RJ-JD:4512]

¶3

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶4

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9611/2021

¶5

Padma Jaipal W/o Shri Nikhil Kumar, Aged About 34 Years, Anukiran Colony, Rawatbhata, District Chittorgarh (Rajasthan).

¶6

----Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through The Director Cum Joint Secretary, Directorate Local Self Department, Jaipur (Rajasthan).

¶9

Municipal Board, Rawatbhata, District Chittorgarh Through Its Executive Officer.

¶10

	----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Shailesh Agarwal
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Sunile Beniwal,AAG

¶11

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI Order

¶12

29/01/2024

¶13

This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been preferred by the petitioner challenging the impugned order dated 19.07.2021 (Annex.1) passed by the respondents.

¶14

The interim order against the impugned order dated 19.07.2021 (Annex.1) is operating since 29.07.2021.

¶15

Learned counsel for the parties jointly submit that interim order granted against the order dated 19.07.2021 (Annex.1) be made absolute and the respondents may be given liberty to pass fresh order in administrative exigency in case required.

¶16

On such submission, the present petition is disposed of while making the interim order dated 29.07.2021 passed by this Court

[2024:RJ-JD:4512]

[CW-9611/2021]

(2 of 2)

staying the effect and operation of the order dated 19.07.2021 (Annex.1) as absolute. It is made clear that the respondents shall be at liberty to pass fresh order and transfer the petitioner, in accordance with law, obviously, if administrative exigency so warrants.

¶21

All pending applications also stand disposed of.

¶22

(DR. PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.

¶23

259-devrajP/-

Padma Jaipal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Padma Jaipal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajbala Vs State of Rajasthan

Kailash Ram Baswana Vs State of Rajasthan

Naveen Kumar Vs State and Ors.

Xx Vs Yy

M/S Gayatri Granites Vs State of Rajasthan

Subham Tripathi Vs High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan