Allowed

Ram Singh Meena S/O Sh. Ram Karan Meena v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

Rajasthan HC5 Jan 2024CW/9399/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court allowed the D.B. Civil Writ Petition relying on the operative decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Union of India Versus M/S. Ganpati Dealcom Pvt. Ltd., pending review. The disputed property was directed to be released subject to the final outcome of the pending review petition.

What did the court decide?

Release of the disputed property subject to the final order of the Supreme Court in the pending review petition.

Ram Singh Meena S/O Sh. Ram Karan Meena Vs Assistant… — Income Tax | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:693-DB]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9399/2023

¶4

Ram Singh Meena S/o Sh. Ram Karan Meena, Aged About 53 Years, R/o Village And Post - Mainpura, Tehsil And District - Sawai Madhopur.

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, (Benami Prohibition) And Initiating Officer, Under Pbpt Act-1988 For State Of Rajasthan, Jaipur, Room No. - Na-103, New Central Revenue Building, Statue Circule, C-Scheme, Jaipur-302001.

¶8

Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, (Benami Prohibition), Jaipur, Room No. 250, New Central Revenue Building, Statue Circle, Jaipur.

¶9

----Respondents

¶10

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Javed Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Siddharth Bapna

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR

¶12

Order

¶13

05/01/2024

¶14

The application No.01/2023 seeking disposal of the writ petition is allowed.

¶15

Heard.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the issue raised in this petition has been decided by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Union of India & Another Versus M/S. Ganpati Dealcom Pvt. Ltd., AIR 2022 SC 4558.

¶17

Learned counsel for the respondents, however, would submit

[2024:RJ-JP:693-DB]

[CW-9399/2023]

(2 of 2)

that though the Hon’ble Supreme Court has decided the issue in the aforesaid case, review petition has been filed which is pending consideration before the Hon’ble Supreme Court.

¶22

Learned counsel for the respondents, however, could not dispute that the order passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Union of India & Another Versus M/S. Ganpati Dealcom Pvt. Ltd. (supra) remains operative and has not been decided so far.

¶23

In view of the above, this petition also deserves to be allowed and accordingly, the property in dispute being “01/12 part of Khasra No. 832 [having total area of 0.05 hectare] of Village Kukas, Tehsil-Amer, District Jaipur” deserves to be released. Let necessary steps be taken to release the disputed property.

¶24

It is, however, made clear that the release will be subject to the final order that may ultimately be passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the pending review petition.

¶25

Writ petition is, accordingly, allowed.

¶26

(ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J

¶27

(ARUN BHANSALI),J

¶28

AARZOO ARORA/TANISHA /25

Ram Singh Meena S/O Sh. Ram Karan Meena v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ram Singh Meena S/O Sh. Ram Karan Meena v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bijendra Singh Son of Shri Nandram Vs Income Tax Officer

Jai Prakash Soni Son of Shri Ram Kishore Soni Vs the State of Rajasthan

M/S Govinsha Autowheels LLP Vs Assistant Commissioner, Circle B, Commercial Taxes Department

M/S Baba Super Minerals Private Limited Vs Union of India

M/S Baba Super Minerals Private Limited Vs Union of India

M/S Baba Super Minerals Private Limited Vs Union of India