Disposed

Indian Red Crose Society v. U O I and Ors.

Rajasthan HC5 Sept 2024CW/885/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Rajasthan High Court disposed of a writ petition filed by the Ajmer District Branch of the Indian Red Cross Society seeking relief regarding the appointment of an Administrator as infructuous after subsequent developments, including the election of officers, while keeping one prayer open.

What did the court decide?

The petition disposed of as infructuous; Prayer No.3 kept open for future remedies.

Indian Red Crose Society Vs U O I and Ors. — Writ and Judicial Review | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:37600]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 885/2016

¶4

Indian Red Cross Society, District Branch Ajmer, through its Honorary Secretary Colnel Keshav Datt Upadhyay aged about 76 years, Opp.J.L.N. Hospital, Ajmer

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

The Union of India, through the Secretary to the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (Department of Health), Nirman Bhawan, New Delhi.

¶8

The State of Rajsthan, through the Secretary to the Medical and Health Department, Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan).

¶9

The Indian Red Cross Society, National Headquarters, 1-Red Cross Road, New Delhi through Its Secretary General.

¶10

The St. John’s Ambulance Association (India), National Headquarters, 1-Red Cross Road, New Delhi through Its Secretary General.

¶11

The Indian Red Cross Society, Rajasthan State Branch, through Its Administrator, Sanganeri Gate, Jaipur (Rajasthan).

¶12

The Administrator, The Indian Red Cross Society, Rajasthan State Branch, Sanganeri Gate, Jaipur (Rajasthan).

¶13

The District Collector, Ajmer.

¶14

----Respondent

¶15

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr.Harsh Dadhich for Mr.Veyankatesh Garg
For Respondent(s)	: Mr.R.D.Rastogi, ASG with
	Mr.Devesh Yadav, CGC

¶16

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN

¶17

Order

¶18

05/09/2024

¶19

This petition was filed aggrieved of appointment of the Administrator.

¶20

Learned counsel for the respondents has produced report of handing over charge dated 23.05.2023, wherein after completion

(2 of 2)

[2024:RJ-JP:37600]

[CW-885/2016]

of the election, the Chairman, the Vice Chairman and Treasurer were elected and the charge was handed over to them.

¶25

Learned counsel for the petitioner due to lack of instructions is not in a position to refute the subsequent developments.

¶26

The petition is disposed of as infructuous.

¶27

The prayer No.3 is kept open. The petitioner shall be at liberty to avail remedies in accordance with law, if still aggrieved.

¶28

(AVNEESH JHINGAN),J

¶29

Monika/100

Indian Red Crose Society v. U O I and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Indian Red Crose Society v. U O I and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Beeram Bai Vs State of Raj and Ors.

Snt Rehmati and Ors. Vs State Home Department and Ors.

Giriraj Sharma Vs State of Raj and Ors.

Jubaideen Andanr Vs State of Raj and Ors.

Sh. Nanu Ram S/O Sh. Narbha Vs State of Rajasthan

Managing Committee Seth Vs State of Raj and Anr.