The High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by the Union of India challenging an order of the Central Administrative Tribunal. The Court found no error in the Tribunal's order, which dismissed the promotion claim of the respondent after considering his service records.
The writ petition is dismissed at the stage of admission.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:24072-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7959/2024
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. B.S. Chhaba, Deputy Solicitor General of India with Mr. Mukesh Dudi For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA
Order
21/05/2024
(2 of 2)
[2024:RJ-JP:24072-DB]
[CW-7959/2024]
Jaipur, whereby the original application filed by the respondent was allowed.
(SHUBHA MEHTA),J
(PANKAJ BHANDARI),J
LAKSHYA-DAKSH/6
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition filed by the Union of India is maintainable in light of the findings by the Central Administrative Tribunal.
Whether there is any error in the impugned order of the Central Administrative Tribunal regarding the promotion of the respondent.
Union of India through its Secretary to the Government of India, Department of Posts
Chief Post Master General, Rajasthan Circle, Jaipur
Senior Superintendent, Post Offices, Jaipur Division
R.K. Koli
Central Administrative Tribunal, Jaipur Bench
Pankaj Bhandari
Shubha Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
