Order in a writ petition noted the absence of any representation by the petitioner. Held that the nature of relief sought has become stale and meaningless.
Petition dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JD:16729]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 770/2009
Smt. Tara
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Raj. And Ors
----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : None. For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA
Order
18/04/2024
Petition was filed some time in the year 2009. There is no interim protection in favour of the petitioner since filing of the petition. When called out for hearing, none appears for the petitioner. It appears that by sheer passage of time, the nature of relief sought by the petitioner is rendered stale and meaningless and/or otherwise he seem to have acquiesced to his fait accompli and moved on in life. That is why perhaps, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.
Dismissed for non-prosecution.
(ARUN MONGA),J
234-Sumit/-
Smt. Tara
State Of Raj.
Arun Monga
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
