The High Court dismissed the civil writ petition as infructuous due to subsequent developments occurring during the pendency of the proceedings, leaving no surviving cause of action.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:28914-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7526/2007
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ankit Kumar Mr. Mahendra Verma for Mr. Dinesh Yadav For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR
Order
10/07/2024
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in view of the subsequent developments during pendency of the writ petition, no cause of action survives for pursuing the petition.
In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as rendered infructuous.
(ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J
(AVNEESH JHINGAN),J
CHANDAN/TANISHA/10
Upendar Kumar Soni
Union Of India
Avneesh Jhingam
Ashutosh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
