Petitioners' grievances concerning encroachments over public land were submitted to have been redressed by the respondents, with encroachments removed and a sixty feet pakka road constructed. The writ petition was accordingly disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JD:1792-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 708/2023
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
(2 of 2)
[2024:RJ-JD:1792-DB]
[CW-708/2023]
| For Petitioner(s) | : Ms. Twinkle Purohit for |
|---|---|
| Mr. Sanjeet Purohit | |
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Sunil Beniwal, AAG |
| Mr. Rajesh Parihar |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA PRAKASH SONI
Judgment / Order
11/01/2024
Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the grievances raised by the petitioners in this writ petition have already been redressed by the respondents and the encroachments made over the public land have been removed and sixty feet pakka road has already been constructed.
In view of the above, this writ petition is disposed of.
(RAJENDRA PRAKASH SONI),J
(VIJAY BISHNOI),J
17-DivyaTak/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the grievance regarding encroachments on public land had been redressed by the respondents.
Omprakash Padihar
Kishan Singh Padihar
Piyush Kabra
Shailendra Jhanwar
Ramesh Nath
Rakesh Jaitlia
Vijay Bishnoi
Rajendra Prakash Soni
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
