A writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution due to lack of instructions from the petitioner. The court granted liberty to move for revival if cause of action survives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:49345]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6888/2014
----Petitioners
Versus
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sandeep Pathak For Respondent(s) :
(2 of 2)
[2024:RJ-JP:49345]
[CW-6888/2014]
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN
Order
02/12/2024
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that inspite of best efforts, he is not getting any instructions from the petitioner to enable him to pursue the petition.
The writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
The petitioner shall be at liberty to move an application for revival of the writ petition, if cause of action survives.
(AVNEESH JHINGAN),J
Chandan/4
Mohan Kanwar
Bhanwar Singh
Board Of Revenue, Ajmer
Avneesh Jhingan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
