Dismissed

Surendra Kumar Jain v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC23 May 2024CW/677/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan disposed of three connected writ petitions by joint consent. All counsels agreed the matter ceased to be res-integra following a Coordinate Bench judgment in Deen Dayal Garg v. State of Rajasthan.

What did the court decide?

The writ petitions were disposed of by joint order, allowing the petitions to the same terms as the judgment in Deen Dayal Garg v. State of Rajasthan.

Surendra Kumar Jain Vs State of Rajasthan — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JD:23598]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 855/2019

¶4

Ritu W/o Shri Mahender Kumar D/o Shri Ramkishan, Aged About 35 Years, By Caste Mawar, R/o Ward No. 18, Pilibangan, District Hanumangarh (Raj.).

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department Of Secondary Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶8

The Director, Secondary Education, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Bikaner.

¶9

The Deputy Director, Secondary Education, Bikaner Zone, Bikaner.

¶10

----Respondents

¶11

Connected With

¶12

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 677/2019

¶13

Surendra Kumar Jain S/o Shri Mangi Lal Jain, Aged About 64 Years, R/o Cement Gali Rishabdev Distt. Udaipur, Rajasthan.

¶14

----Petitioner

¶15

Versus

¶16

State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Education (Secondary Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶17

Director, Department Of Secondary Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Bikaner, Rajasthan.

¶18

Principal Secretary, Department Of Personnel, Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶19

----Respondents

¶20

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 854/2019

¶21

Mahender Kumar S/o Shri Bhagirath Mawar, Aged About 41 Years, By Caste Mawar, R/o Ward No. 18, Pilibangan, District Hanumangarh (Raj.).

¶22

----Petitioner

¶23

Versus

¶24

State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department Of Secondary Education, Government Of Rajasthan,

¶25

(2 of 2) [CW-855/2019]

¶26

[2024:RJ-JD:23598]

¶27

Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶28

The Director, Secondary Education, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Bikaner.

¶29

The Deputy Director, Secondary Education, Bikaner Zone, Bikaner.

¶30

----Respondents

¶31

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. J.S. Bhaleria. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sarwan Kumar.

¶32

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA

¶33

Order

¶34

23/05/2024

¶35

Both the learned counsels are ad idem that the controversy raised by the petitioners herein is no more res-integra in view of the judgment rendered by a Coordinate Bench of this Court at Jaipur in the case of Deen Dayal Garg v. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6653/2023) , decided on 24.05.2023 .

¶36

In view of the aforesaid consensus, the instant writ petition is also disposed of by joint consent in the same terms as judgment ibid.

¶37

All pending application(s), if any, also disposed of.

¶38

(ARUN MONGA),J

¶39

272 to 274-Rmathur/-

Surendra Kumar Jain v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Surendra Kumar Jain v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt Renuka Parihar Vs Bank of Baroda

Ritesh Upadhyay Vs State and Ors.

Veerma Ram Choudhary Vs State of Rajasthan

Satish Kumar Kodli Vs State of Rajasthan

Neel Kamal Vs State of Rajasthan

Pratap Singh Vs State of Rajasthan