Allowed

Anil Kumar Chaturvedi S/O Sh. Ram Gopal Chaturvedi v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC29 May 2024CW/6532/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A single judge dismissed this writ petition allowing petitioners liberty to file a representation for pension benefits based on the Division Bench judgment in Ramesh Chander Gupta (2021) referenced by the Supreme Court.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed of with liberty to file a representation for pension benefits; respondents directed to pass appropriate order within two months.

Anil Kumar Chaturvedi S/O Sh. Ram Gopal… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:25576]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6532/2024

¶4

Anil Kumar Chaturvedi S/o Sh. Ram Gopal Chaturvedi, Aged About 60 Years, R/o 537, Hanuman Ka Rasta, Gokul Misr Ka Darwaja, Jaipur-302003 (Raj.). Retired From The Post Of Senior Teacher In Pandit Deendayal Upadhyaya Gsss Rathkhana, Jaipur (East).

¶5

Anil Kumar Goyal, S/o Sh. Jagannath Prasad Goyal, Aged About 60 Years, R/o Girraj Colony, Rajakhera Bai Pass, Dhaulpur-328001 (Rajasthan). Retired From The Post Of Treasury Officer-2 In Treasuries And Accounts Department (Rajasthan).

¶6

Dinesh Chand Singhal S/o Sh. Vishambhar Dayal, Aged About 61 Years, R/o Adrash Colony, Mohan Nagar Vistar, Near Jupiter Public School, Tehsil-Hindaun City, DistKarauli (Rajasthan). Retired From The Post Of Principal In Government Secondary School, New Mandi, Hindaun.

¶7

Jagdish Prasad Jat, S/o Sh. Ramji Lal, Aged About 63 Years, R/o Ward No -02, Dhani Lamba Ki, Peetham Puri, Sikar-332708 (Rajasthan). Retired From The Post Of Assistant Accounts Officer Grade I In Telecom (Police) Department (Rajasthan).

¶8

Mohanlal Kumawat, S/o Sh. Ram Ratan Kumawat, Aged About 60 Years, R/o House No. 1-L-34, Hanuman Mandir Ke Paas, Mahaveer Nagar Ext., Kota-324009 (Rajasthan). Retired From The Post Of Teacher In Rajasthan Senior Secondary School, Godiyacharan.

¶9

Prahlad Rai Saini, S/o Sh. Sukh Dewa Ram, Aged About 63 Years, R/o Dhani Sanwala, Babai, Jhunjhunu-333501 (Rajasthan). Retired From The Post Of Assistant Accounts Officer Grade-I In Municipal Council, Jhunjhunu.

¶10

Ram Singh Charan, S/o Sh. Laxman Singh, Aged About 64 Years, R/o Shree Karni Kung Anand Lok Ke Paas, Rampura, Jaipur-303704 (Rajasthan). Retired From The Post Of Inspector, Land Records In Revenue Department, Amer.

¶11

Suraj Bhan, S/o Sh. Ram Ji Lal, Aged About 60 Years, R/o Tamboli House, 151, R.k. Puram, Ward No. 99, Near Palash School, Sitapura, Sanganer, Jaipur-302022 (Rajasthan). Retired From The Post Of Vice Principal In

(2 of 4)

[2024:RJ-JP:25576]

[CW-6532/2024]

Government Senior Secondary School, Sukhpuriya, Jaipur.

¶16

----Petitioners

¶17

Versus

¶18

State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Additional Chief Secretary, Finance Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

¶19

State Of Rajasthan, Through Joint Secretary, Finance (Revenue) Department Jaipur, Rajasthan.

¶20

State Of Rajasthan, Through Director, Pension Department, Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

¶21

State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Commissioner, Municipal Council, Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan.

¶22

State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department Of Education, Government Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

¶23

State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Director, Department Of Education, Bikaner, Rajasthan.

¶24

State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Director, Treasuries And Accounts, Jaipur Rajasthan.

¶25

State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Directorate Police Telecommunication Rajasthan, Jaipur.

¶26

----Respondents

¶27

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Apoorv Bansal For Respondent(s) :

¶28

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order

¶29

29/05/2024

¶30

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the controversy involved in the present case is squarely covered by the Division Bench judgment in the case of Ramesh Chander Gupta Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2800/2021) and other connected matters, decided on 17.10.2023 .

¶31

(3 of 4) [CW-6532/2024]

¶32

[2024:RJ-JP:25576]

¶33

In these circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks liberty to approach respondent/s by way of filing representation for redressal of their grievances in the light of judgment rendered by this court in the case of Ramesh Chander Gupta (supra) .

¶34

In the case of Ramesh Chander Gupta (supra) , Division Bench of this Court inter-alia while referring to orders passed in Union of India & Ors. Vs. Manohar Lal & Ors.: D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5445/2022, dediced on 07.08.2023 & the Commissioner, Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan & Anr. Vs. Ram Karan Bhakar & Ors.: D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4139/2022 as well as judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Director (Admn. & HR) KPTCL & Ors. Vs. C.P. Mundinamani & Ors.: 2023 SCC online SC 401 has passed the following directions:-

¶35

“It is also brought to the notice of this Court that Special Leave Petition (C) No. 3420/2023 and Special Leave Petition (C) No. 1011/2023 have also been disposed off on 19.05.2023. A copy of the orders dated 11.04.2023 and 19.05.2023 passed by Hon’ble Supreme Court have also been placed on record. Therefore, the present petitions are also disposed off on the same terms with direction to the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioners and pass appropriate orders and other consequential benefits as per their entitlement. Whatever amount is found payable be also released within a period of one month. Accordingly, the present petitions are disposed of.”

¶36

Ordered accordingly.

¶37

In the event of filing a representation by the petitioners, the respondent/s shall consider the claim of the petitioners and pass an appropriate order within two months from the date of receipt of

[2024:RJ-JP:25576]

[CW-6532/2024]

(4 of 4)

representation with certified copy of this order and that too in accordance with law and the observations made in the case of Ramesh Chander Gupta (supra), read with order dated 11.04.2023 in SLP(C) No. 3420/2023 and order dated 19.05.2023 in SLP(C) No. 1011/2023 passed by Hon’ble Apex Court, as has been referred in the case of C.P. Mundinamani & Ors. (supra).

¶42

The present writ petition stands disposed of. 7. The order has been passed based on the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners and the averments made in the writ petition. The respondent/s would be at liberty to examine the veracity of the submissions made in the writ petition in the light of the observations made by the Division Bench of this court in the case of Ramesh Chander Gupta (supra) , and only in case the averments made therein are found to be correct, the petitioner be extended the relief as prayed with consequential benefits as ordered in the case of Ramesh Chander Gupta (supra), read with order dated 11.04.2023 in SLP(C) No. 3420/2023 and order dated 19.05.2023 in SLP(C) No. 1011/2023 passed by Hon’ble Apex Court, as has been referred in the case of C.P. Mundinamani & Ors. (supra).

¶43

Pending application/s, if any, also stand disposed of.

¶44

(GANESH RAM MEENA),J

¶45

Satyendra/74

Anil Kumar Chaturvedi S/O Sh. Ram Gopal Chaturvedi v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anil Kumar Chaturvedi S/O Sh. Ram Gopal Chaturvedi v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt Chandramukhi Vs State of Raj and Ors.

Muskan Bairwa D/O Shri Harphool Bairwa Vs the State of Rajasthan

Sh. Mukesh Kumar S/O Ram Kumar Vs Addational Chief Secretary (Acs)

Mahipal Singh Samota S/O Mohan Lal Samota Vs State of Rajasthan

Smt Renu Chaturvedi Wife of Shri Gajendra Chaturvedi, Vs State of Rajasthan

Dr Ravi Shekhawat Son of Shri Pushkar Singh Shekhawat, Vs State of Rajasthan