Goshala sought direction to accept its application for State financial assistance under the 2021 guidelines. Respondents undertook to proceed in accordance with an earlier judgment of this Court and issue a show cause notice. Petition dismissed as not pressed with liberty to approach the Court on any adverse decision.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JD:18875]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6157/2024
Channay Vikas And Seva Sansthan Goshala, Through Its Secretary Ajij Khan S/o Nabab Khan, Aged About 69 Years, Resident Of Village Jesurana, Tehsil And District Jaisalmer (Raj.).
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Ramesh Kumar & |
|---|---|
| Mr. Somu Khan Mangliya | |
| For Respondent(s) | : Dr. Praveen Khandelwal, AAG with |
| Mr. Piyush Bhandari |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Order
01/05/2024
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
The present writ petition has been filed with a prayer that the respondents may be directed to accept the online/offline application of the petitioner for grant of financial assistance by the State Government as per the guidelines of 2021.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the basis, on which the respondents were not accepting the application, does not survive as this Court in the case of Hariyala Rajasthan
[2024:RJ-JD:18875]
[CW-6157/2024]
(2 of 2)
Gaushala Vikash Sansthan vs. The State of Rajasthan & Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4199/2024), decided on 25.04.2024 has quashed the order dated 14.02.2024 (Annex.6) and, therefore, the cause on which the application was not being accepted by the respondents does not survive.
Per contra , learned counsel for the respondents submits that the respondents will prospectively proceed in the matter in accordance with the judgment rendered by this Court in case of Hariyala Rajasthan Gaushala Vikash Sansthan (supra) and will give a Show Cause Notice to the petitioner on the shortcomings observed in the inspection conducted by their Inspectors and if the petitioner’s case is found eligible, his application will also be accepted for the grant of the financial assistance as per the guidelines of 2021.
In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the respondents, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press this petition at this stage, however, seeks liberty to approach the Court, if any adverse decision is taken by the respondents.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed at this stage with aforesaid liberty.
The stay application and other pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J
61-SanjayS/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondents should be directed to accept the petitioner's application for grant of financial assistance under the 2021 guidelines.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Hariyala Rajasthan Gaushala Vikash Sansthan vs. The State of Rajasthan & Ors.Followed¶22
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4199/2024, decided on 25.04.2024
Channay Vikas And Seva Sansthan Goshala, through its Secretary Ajij Khan
The State of Rajasthan, through Secretary, Department of Animal Husbandry
The Director, Gopalan-Directorate, Government of Rajasthan
The Joint Director, Department of Animal Husbandry, Jaisalmer
The District Collector, Jaisalmer
VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
