The petitioner's counsel submitted that due to subsequent events, the writ petition was not being pressed. The Court dismissed the petition as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JD:20767]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6121/2024
Ganesh Ram S/o Sawaram, Aged About 63 Years, R/o Nandiya, Tehsil Bagoda, District Sanchore Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manas Ranchhor Khatri. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Monal Chugh.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Order
09/05/2024
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to subsequent events having been taken place in the present case, he does not press this writ petition at this stage.
Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.
(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J
25-Shahenshah/-
Ganesh Ram
State of Rajasthan
Sub Division Officer, Bagoda
Tehsildar, Bagoda
Vinit Kumar Mathur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
