Petitioner sought modification of an interim order in a writ petition against YouTube content, stating her grievance complaint was already filed and responded to. The court directed the Union of India's Nodal Officer under the IT Intermediary Rules 2021 to take necessary steps to block or offload the impugned content expeditiously.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT of JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5842/2024
Shubhra Ghosh Baheti W/o Shri Govind Baheti, Aged About 28 Years, R/o C-80, Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur - 342003 (Raj.).
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Sunil Joshi |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Mukesh Rajpurohit, Dy.S.G |
| assisted byMs. Dimple Rajpurohit |
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE NUPUR BHATI Order
25/07/2024
[CW-5842/2024]
(2 of 2)
System and further the Grievance Redressal Mechanism System may be directed to decide the same within 24 hours and based on his submissions, this Court had directed the petitioner-applicant to file a complaint before the Grievance Redressal Mechanism and the Grievance Redressal Mechanism was directed to decide the same within 24 hours.
(DR. NUPUR BHATI),J
117-amit/-
1 issue framed by the court
Should the Nodal Officer be directed to act under the IT Intermediary Rules, 2021 to block/offload the content in question expeditiously?
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Shubhra Ghosh Baheti
Union of India, through the Secretary, Ministry of Electronic And Information Technology
Youtube (through Resident Grievance Officer)
Nupur Bhati
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
