Writ petition sought directions to the Registrar of Trade Marks to decide a form TM-P for verifying assignment of the 'BRIJ' trademark. The court found no material showing the application was pending and declined to issue directions, disposing of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:33974]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5572/2023
Brij Honey Pvt. Ltd., B-94, Jawahar Nagar, Bharatpur (Rajasthan) Through Director Vinit Singh S/o Chandrapal Singh
----Petitioner
Versus
The Registrar Of Trade Marks, (Govt. Of India) Near Chanakyapuri Overbridge, Ghatlodiya, Ahmedabad (Guj.)
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashwani Kumar Gupta for Mr. G.D. Bansal For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Order
08/08/2024
[2024:RJ-JP:33974]
[CW-5572/2023]
(2 of 2)
Rules 75 and 76(2) of the Trade Marks Rules, 2017, to proceed verifying the assignment, however, such application has not been considered and decided by the respondent. Counsel further contends that after filing of form TM-P on 08.07.2019, a reminder dated 28.10.2022 was sent to the respondent, but same has not been responded. Hence, the present writ petition.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J
Sachin/94
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Court should direct the Registrar of Trade Marks to act on the petitioner's form TM-P filed on 08.07.2019 seeking verification of trademark assignment.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Brij Honey Pvt. Ltd. (through Director Vinit Singh)
The Registrar of Trade Marks
Sudesh Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
