Disposed

Anil Kumar Arora v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC8 Jul 2024CW/5381/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition concerning a service-related benefit was disposed of on counsel's submission, adopting the Division Bench's directions in Narendra Kumar Boolchandani: representations to be decided per the Government's stand in similar cases.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed of with directions permitting representation-based decision as per Narendra Kumar Boolchandani; relief subject to verification of averments.

Anil Kumar Arora Vs State of Rajasthan — Service and Employment | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JD:27364]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5381/2024

¶4

Anil Kumar Arora, R/o 1/13, Malviya Nagar Jaipur, District Jaipur, Rajasthan.

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department of Revenue Board, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶8

The Director, Revenue Board, Government Of Rajasthan, Ajmer.

¶9

Ad Director, Revenue Board, Ajmer.

¶10

The District Collector, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

¶11

----Respondents

¶12

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gulab Singh

¶13

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI Order

¶14

08/07/2024

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in similar circumstances and similar matters, the Division Bench of this Court in The Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner Vs. Narendra Kumar Boolchandani & Ors.; D.B.Special Appeal Writ No.362/2020 along with connected matters, while considering the aspect that the issue in question has arisen in large number of cases and the Government has accepted the stand and granted the benefits, disposed of the appeals with the following directions:-

¶16

“Learned counsel for the petitioners, however, submitted that the issue is arising in large number of cases and in several departments, the Government has accepted the stand and granted the benefits. If the petitioners are not granted similar benefits, it would amount to discriminatory treatment. Whatever be the

(2 of 2)

[2024:RJ-JD:27364]

[CW-5381/2024]

grievance of the petitioners they can be resolved at the level of the administration or by the Court through bipartite hearing.

¶21

In view of the peculiar circumstances, these appeals are disposed of by permitting the Government to take into account the representations already made or to be filed by any of the petitioners within one month. In the process, the authorities will bear in mind the stand taken by the department in similar cases. Such representations would be decided in accordance with law unmindful of the observations and directions issued by the learned Single Judge in the impugned orders. Eventually, if the grievances of the petitioner still survive after the Government decision, it is open for the petitioners to seeks redressal thereafter in accordance with law.”

¶22

Counsel for the petitioner submits that the present writ petition of the petitioner may also be disposed of in light of the above-mentioned judgment.

¶23

In view of the submissions made, the present writ petition is disposed of with the same directions as issued by the Division Bench of this Court in the case of Narendra Kumar Boolchandani (supra) .

¶24

The order has been passed based on the submissions made in the petition, the respondents would be free to examine the veracity of the submissions made in the petition and only in case, the averments made therein are found to be correct, the petitioner would be entitled to the relief.

¶25

(FARJAND ALI),J

¶26

20-Ashutosh/-

Anil Kumar Arora v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anil Kumar Arora v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Virendra Singh Rathore Vs the Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation

Suresh Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan

Vishal Vs State of Rajasthan

Puraram Vs State of Rajasthan

Sohanlal Ninama Vs State of Rajasthan

Sunil Sharma Vs Rajasthan State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd.