In this dismissed writ petition, the High Court of Rajasthan held that the petition is dropped for want of instructions from the petitioners.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:6765-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5024/2015
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Ms.Shobha Sharma For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA
Order
09/02/2024
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in spite of best efforts, she is not getting any instructions from the petitioners to enable her to pursue the petition.
The petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
The petitioners shall be at liberty to move an application for revival of the petition, if cause of action still survives.
(SHUBHA MEHTA),J
(AVNEESH JHINGAN),J
Monika/1
Misro Devi
Savitri Devi
Banarsi Devi
Kaushalya Devi
Vimla Devi
State Of Rajasthan
Avneesh Jhingan
Shubha Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
