The High Court dismissed a State's writ petition challenging a 2014 Revenue Board order. The Court held the petition was highly belated and misconceived, noting the dispute was inter-parties and no substantial prejudice was caused by the delay, deprecating the State's casual approach.
Writ petition and stay application dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JD:36081]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4131/2024
State Of Rajasthan, Through Tehsildar (Revenue) Tibbi, District Hanumangarh.
----Petitioner
Versus
(2 of 3) [CW-4131/2024]
[2024:RJ-JD:36081]
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Sanjay Raj Paliwal, Government |
|---|---|
| Counsel with Mr. Govinlal Suthar, Dy. | |
| Government Counsel | |
| For Respondent(s) | : - |
JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA
Order
02/09/2024
“That learned District Collector Hanumangarh on 14.06.2022 ordered to file writ petition against the judgment and in this regards and appointed Officer-In-
[2024:RJ-JD:36081]
[CW-4131/2024]
(3 of 3)
Charge. Thereafter as per instructions of Government Counsel on 02.02.2024 and after drafting to writ petition is being filed. Hence delay in filing the writ petition is unintentional.”
(DINESH MEHTA),J
19-raksha/-
3 issues framed by the court
Whether to allow a highly belated writ petition challenging a Revenue Board order of 2014 passed over eight years ago.
Whether the State can challenge a suit disposed of by compromise after allegedly suffering loss of revenue.
Whether substantial prejudice is caused to the State by the delay.
State Of Rajasthan, Through Tehsildar (Revenue) Tibbi, District Hanumangarh
Shersingh S/o Teksingh
Jasmel Kaur W/o Teksingh
Gurdayal Singh S/o Vishansingh
Lrs Of Vinod Kumar
Dinesh Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
