A writ petition was dismissed by this High Court as infructuous because the petitioner's counsel submitted no cause of action survives due to subsequent developments during pendency.
The writ petition is dismissed as rendered infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:39447]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4022/2023
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Lokesh Khowal for Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN
[2024:RJ-JP:39447]
[CW-4022/2023]
(2 of 2)
Order
18/09/2024
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in view of the subsequent developments during pendency of the writ petition, no cause of action survives for pursuing the petition.
In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as rendered infructuous.
(AVNEESH JHINGAN),J
Chandan/62
All India Medical Students Association (United)
Praveen Kumar Laxkar
State Of Rajasthan
Avneesh Jhingan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
