Petitioner sought directions for expeditious disposal of a pending suit filed in 2023. The Court held no exceptional circumstances existed to fix a schedule, dismissing the writ petition while expecting the trial court to act expeditiously.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:21716]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3140/2024
Smt. Uma Khunteta Wife of Shri Sanju Khunteta, Resident of House No.6, Manav Ashram Colony, Gopalpura Mod, Tonk Road, Jaipur.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Uday Shankar Acharya, Adv.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order
08/05/2024
2 Counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondent No.1/plaintiff is son of the petitioner and he has filed a suit for permanent injunction, partition and cancellation of gift deed. Counsel submits that looking to the nature of controversy involved
[2024:RJ-JP:21716]
[CW-3140/2024]
(2 of 2)
in this matter, the matter requires urgent disposal. Therefore, appropriate directions may be issued to the trial Court.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J
MR/42
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a time bound disposal schedule can be fixed for a civil suit pending for one year.
Whether the petitioner deserves directions for expeditious disposal of the underlying suit.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
High Court Bar Association Allahabad Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.Referred¶21
High Court Bar Association Allahabad Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.
Smt. Uma Khunteta
Kunal Khunteta
Sanju Khunteta
Anchal Khunteta
Anoop Kumar Dhand
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
