Disposed

Gopal Chand Jat v. the Jodhpur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited

Rajasthan HC12 Mar 2024CW/3058/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition seeking posting at a nearby place. Petitioner agreed to pursue a representation; the court disposed of the petition directing him to file a representation and the competent authority to decide it in accordance with law within six weeks.

What did the court decide?

Direction to file representation and for competent authority to decide it in accordance with law within six weeks; stay application disposed of.

Gopal Chand Jat Vs the Jodhpur Vidyut Vitran Nigam… — Service and Employment | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JD:11892]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3058/2024

¶4

Gopal Chand Jat S/o Shri Arjun Ram Jat, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Ward No. 04, Momasar Bas, Tehsil Sridungargarh, District Bikaner, Rajasthan.

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

The Jodhpur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited, Jodhpur Through Its Managing Director, New Power House Road, Jodhpur, Rajasthan.

¶8

The Secretary (Admn.), The Jodhpur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited, Jodhpur, Rajasthan.

¶9

The Zonal Chief Engineer (B/z), Jodhpur Discom, Bikaner, Rajasthan.

¶10

----Respondents

¶11

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gopal Chand Jat, Petitioner present in person

¶12

For Respondent(s) : Ms. Gayatri Kumari, Personnel Officer (OIC), Jodhpur Discom present in person

¶13

JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA

¶14

Order

¶15

12/03/2024

¶16

Petitioner, who is present in person, submits that he would be satisfied, if an appropriate direction is issued to the respondents to consider his representation (which he would be making) to be posted at a nearby place, in accordance with law, where concerned post is lying vacant.

¶17

The present writ petition is, therefore, disposed of with the direction to the petitioner to address a representation before the competent authority pointing out vacant posts within a period of two weeks alongwith certified copy of the order instant.

(2 of 2)

[2024:RJ-JD:11892]

[CW-3058/2024]

In case, such representation is filed by the petitioner, the competent authority shall decide the same, in accordance with law, preferably within a period of six weeks from the receipt thereof.

¶22

It is made clear that aforesaid direction to decide the representation has been issued only with a view to ensure expeditious redressal of petitioner’s grievance. The same may not be construed to be an order to decide the representation in a particular manner.

¶23

The stay application also stands disposed of accordingly.

¶24

(DINESH MEHTA),J

¶25

474-Mak/-

Gopal Chand Jat v. the Jodhpur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gopal Chand Jat v. the Jodhpur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Birma Ram Vs Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation

Kailash Chand Bajiya Vs the State of Rajasthan

Jyoti Verma Vs State of Rajasthan

Chandra Shekhar Vs Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation

Sajjan Singh Vs the State of Rajasthan

Mohammad Rafik Vs State of Rajasthan