Writ petition dismissed due to lack of instructions as contact with clients could not be established, with liberty to revive.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:20582]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2970/2000
(2 of 3)
[2024:RJ-JP:20582]
[CW-2970/2000]
years, R/o House No. 3369, Govind Rajion Ka Rasta, Jaipur.
23/1 Dinesh S/o late Sh. Bhim Singh
23/2 Prem Chand S/o late Sh. Bhim Singh
23/3 Kishore S/o late Sh. Bhim Singh
23/4 Manoj S/o late Sh. Bhim Singh
All R/o House No. 6, Bhrampuri Ka Khurra, Gangauri Bazar, Jaipur.
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Virendra Lodha, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Hanumant Singh Mr. Ankit Rathore For Respondent(s) : Mr. Bhagawat Singh
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Order
01/05/2024
Matter pertains to the Year 2000.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that despite all efforts, no contact could be established with the client. Therefore, as on date, the counsel for the petitioners has no instructions in the matter.
(3 of 3)
[2024:RJ-JP:20582]
[CW-2970/2000]
Considering the arguments advanced, this Court deems it appropriate to dismiss the instant petition with liberty to the petitioners to revive the same, if the need so arises and/or cause of action subsists.
Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed with the aforesaid liberty. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.
(SAMEER JAIN),J
DEEPAK/8
Kushal Singh and Others
State of Rajasthan
Sameer Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
