The High Court of Rajasthan dismissed two connected writ petitions upon the petitioners seeking permission to withdraw them. The petitions were disposed of as withdrawn.
The writ petitions were dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 23338/2018
Raj Growimpex Llp, Having Its Registered Office At 114, 1St Floor, Jaipur Tower, M.i. Road, Jaipur-302 001, Rajasthan (India) Through Its Authorized Representative, Ms. Amrita Sharma, Age 22 Years, Daughter Of Shri Shankar Lal Sharma.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
Connected With
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 23334/2018
G R Enterprises, A Proprietorship Firm Having Principal Place Of Business At C-15,bhagwati Sadan Opposite Laxmi Mandir Cinema Tonk Road Jaipur, Rajasthan, Through Its Proprietor Owner/manager Shri Shital Rander S/o Shri Tej Prakash Rander Age About 40 Years R/o C-15 , Bhagwati Sadan Opposite Laxmi Mandir Cinema Tonk Road Jaipur, Rajasthan, Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
(2 of 2)
[CW-23338/2018]
Commerce Having Its Office At Udyog Bhavan, New Delhi
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Keshav Parashar for |
|---|---|
| Mr. Himanshu Sharma | |
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Anand Sharma |
| Mr. Kinshuk Jain with | |
| Mr. Jai Upadhyay |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA
Order
12/02/2024
Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the writ petitions.
The petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.
(SHUBHA MEHTA),J
(AVNEESH JHINGAN),J
Simple Kumawat /58-59
Raj Growimpex LLP
G R Enterprises
Union Of India
Director General Of Foreign Trade
Commissioner Of Customs
Avneesh Jhingan
Shubha Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
