The High Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous. The petitioner's counsel submitted that subsequent developments during the pendency extinguished the cause of action, leading the bench to withdraw the proceeding without addressing substantive legal questions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:8749-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 23088/2017
Sandeep Sharma S/o Budhi Prakash Sharma, R/o Aa-5, Anita Colony, Bajaj Nagar, Jaipur 302015
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Vrinda Lakhotia for Mr. Sanjay Jhanwar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Siddharth Bapna
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA
Order
20/02/2024
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the subsequent developments during pendency of the writ petition, no cause of action survives for pursuing the petition.
In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as rendered infructuous.
(SHUBHA MEHTA),J
(AVNEESH JHINGAN),J
Himanshu/Chandan--25
Sandeep Sharma
Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
AVNEESH JHINGAN
SHUBHA MEHTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
