Writ petition concerning the petitioner's service matter was dismissed as infructuous on the petitioner counsel's own statement that it had become infructuous. Stay application and pending applications were also dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2284/2020
Sudesh D/o Shri Mahabir Singh, W/o Shri Sher Singh, Aged About 29 Years, By Caste Meghwal, R/o Village And Post Ojtoo, Tehsil Chirawa District Jhunjhunu (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sanjay Mehla Ms. Sunita Mehla For Respondent(s) : Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC alongwith Mr. Mukul Sharma
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Judgment / Order
20/05/2024
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this writ petition has become infructuous.
In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the instant writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Since the main petition has been dismissed, stay application and all pending application/s, if any, shall stand dismissed.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J
GAURAV SRIVASTAVA /55
Sudesh D/o Shri Mahabir Singh
The State of Rajasthan
Additional Director (Admn.) Medical, and Health Services, Rajasthan, Jaipur
Ganesh Ram Meena
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
