Writ petition against respondents; counsel submitted the trial court had decided the main suit, rendering the petition infructuous. The High Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:50283]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2083/2020
Navneet Sharma S/o Late Shri Ram Kishore Pancholi, Aged About 51 Years, By Caste Brahmin, Residence Of House No. 6/368, Chandraghata, Hiran Bazar, Patanpole, Kota (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Shailesh Prakash Sharma |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Mukesh Sharma |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA Order
06/12/2024
Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) submits that the Trial court has decided the main suit. Hence, the civil writ petition has been rendered infructuous.
The civil writ petition is accordingly dismissed as having become infructuous.
(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J
Tahir/100
Navneet Sharma
Ambrish Kumar Sharma
Rajesh Sharma
Narendra Singh Dhaddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
