The Court dismissed a writ petition seeking removal of encroachment from pasture land, noting that a previous order on the same subject matter had already been passed. The petition was held not maintainable on the same grounds, and the petitioner was advised to move an application for revival of the pending contempt petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:8933-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2069/2024
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Arvind Sharma
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL
Order
[2024:RJ-JP:8933-DB]
[CW-2069/2024]
(2 of 3)
21/02/2024
[CW-2069/2024]
[2024:RJ-JP:8933-DB]
(3 of 3)
inclined to entertain the present writ petition (PIL), hence, the
same is dismissed.
(BHUWAN GOYAL),J
(PANKAJ BHANDARI),J
SUDEEPAK /38
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a fresh writ petition on identical grounds is maintainable when a previous order for removal of encroachment exists.
Suresh Chand
Netram Meena
Veer Singh
Beerbal
State Of Rajasthan
The District Collector, District Karauli
Pankaj Bhandari
Bhuvan Goyal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
