The petitioner's counsel submitted that the writ petition had become infructuous. The Court accepted this submission and dismissed the writ petition and all pending applications, including the stay petition, accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JD:16473]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1989/2022
M/s Fatehram Madan Lal, Through Proprietor Madan Lal S/o Fateh Ram Ji Agarwal, Aged 67 Years, R/o Market No. 2, Bhilwara.
----Petitioner
Versus
Khemchand S/o Prabhudayal Sindhi, R/o Chandrashekhar Azad Market, Bhopalganj, Bhilwara.
| ----Respondent | |
|---|---|
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Nikhil Ajmera for Mr. SandeepSarupuria |
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Jaga Ram |
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE NUPUR BHATI
Order
16/04/2024
(DR. NUPUR BHATI),J
119-amit/-
M/s Fatehram Madan Lal, Through Proprietor Madan Lal S/o Fateh Ram Ji Agarwal
Khemchand S/o Prabhudayal Sindhi
Nupur Bhati
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
