High Court judges heard a writ petition where counsel sought to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a fresh one. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn subject to the liberty granted.
Withdrawal of the writ petition allowed with liberty to file a fresh petition based on better particulars.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1983/2024
----Petitioners
[CW-1983/2024]
(2 of 2)
(Formerly Known Urban Improvement Trust) Through Its Commissioner.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashish Kishore Saksena Mr. Harshit Mittal For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL
Order
23/02/2024
Counsel for the petitioners want to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file fresh petition with better particulars, if so advised.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.
(BHUWAN GOYAL),J
(PANKAJ BHANDARI),J
Anu /6
Gopal Krishan Bansal
Kapil Dev Kaushik
State Of Rajasthan
The Director
The Municipal Corporation
Ajmer Development Authority
PANKAJ BHANDARI
BHUWAN GOYAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
