High Court of Rajasthan dismissed the qulifying writ petition as non-prosecuted since the petitioner was no longer pursuing it. Court noted no instructions from the client.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:18948-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1967/2000
Smt Sharmila Kedia W/o Shri Rakesh Kedia, R/o Kedia Palace, Murlipura, Jaipur.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Raghav Krishnatri for Mr. Anant Kasliwal, Sr. Adv. For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL
Order
23/04/2024
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during pendency of the writ petition, he is not getting any instructions from his clients to enable him to pursue the petition.
Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed for nonprosecution. The petitioner shall be at liberty to move an application for revival of the writ petition, if any cause of action arises.
(BHUWAN GOYAL),J
(AVNEESH JHINGAN),J
Anu/Chandan/31
Smt Sharmila Kedia W/o Shri Rakesh Kedia
Union of India through Commissioner of Income Tax, Bikaner Headquarter at Jaipur
The Chief Commissioner, Rajasthan
Joint Commissioner of Income (Assessment) Special Range II
Avneesh Jhing
Bhuvan Goyal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
