Petitioner sought permission to withdraw the civil writ petition citing subsequent developments. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:45496-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1804/2024
M/s Ajay Spycon Housing Developers, Govind Singh Marg, Rajapark, Jaipur Through Partner Atul Kumar Singh S/o Ghanshyam Singh Aged About 49 Years R/o 914, Wonder Heights, Alwar
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vaibhav Bhargava For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sandeep Taneja, AAG with Mr. Aditya Sharma
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS
Order
04/11/2024
Learned counsel for petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition, as no cause of action survives as a result of subsequent development.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J
(AVNEESH JHINGAN),J
Chandan/Yogesh/46
M/s Ajay Spycon Housing Developers
State Of Rajasthan
Uma Shanker Vyas
Avneesh Jhingan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
