Ummed Singh S/O Satyapal Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

The brief facts are that the petitioner was allotted a license of Indian made liquor and composite shop in the year 2021-22. The impugned notice was issued stating that the petitioner failed to lift minimum guaranteed quota of liqor, hence is liable to pay the dues to the department.

¶17

The grievance raised in the present petition is that the demand has been created without giving an opportunity of hearing.

¶18

[2024:RJ-JP:38098]

¶19

[CW-17276/2022]

¶20

(2 of 2)

¶21

Learned Additional Advocate General Mr. Bharat Vyas is appearing for the respondents and submits that the notice itself is a show cause notice.

¶22

The petition is disposed of with the direction that the petitioner shall file response to the notice till 25.09.2024 and after considering the reply filed, the respondents will proceed in accordance with law.

¶23

(AVNEESH JHINGAN),J

¶24

Sunita/19

Ummed Singh S/O Satyapal Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ummed Singh S/O Satyapal Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramlal Son of Shri Hukma Vs the State of Rajasthan

Shakti Electrical Corporation Vs the Registrar of Trade Marks

Nikita Sharma D/O Shri Suresh Chandra Sharma Vs the Coordinator, Joint Entrance Test, Agriculture University

Smt. Rampyari W/O Ghasiram Vs Gulabchand S/O Gopal

Smt Sita Devi Vs State Revenue Department Ors.

M/S K.N. Enterprises Vs State of Rajasthan